Dekorationsartikel gehören nicht zum Leistungsumfang.
Sprache:
Englisch
91,40 €*
Versandkostenfrei per Post / DHL
Lieferzeit 2-4 Werktage
Kategorien:
Beschreibung
For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How is `logical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent theories be considered as true?
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.
For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How is `logical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent theories be considered as true?
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.
Zusammenfassung
Includes supplementary material: [...]
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Preface. From Copernicus to Ptolemy: Inconsistency and Method; T. Nickles. Inconsistent Reasoning toward Consistent Theories; A.I. Miller. Inconsistencies in the History of Mathematics; J.P. Van Bendegem. Mathematical Change and Inconsistency; O. Bueno. Approximate Truth; B. Brown. Inconsistency in Science: A Partial Perspective; N. da Costa, S. French. Inconsistency and the Empirical Sciences; G. Priest. In Defence of a Programme for Handling Inconsistencies; D. Batens. How to Reason Sensibly yet Naturally from Inconsistencies; J. Meheus. Why the Logic of Explanation is Inconsistency-adaptive; E. Weber, K. De Clercq. A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory II; J.D. Norton. Inconsistency, Generic Modeling, and Conceptual Change in Science; N.J. Nersessian. Index.
Details
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2010 |
---|---|
Fachbereich: | Allgemeines |
Genre: | Importe, Philosophie |
Jahrhundert: | Antike |
Rubrik: | Geisteswissenschaften |
Thema: | Lexika |
Medium: | Taschenbuch |
Reihe: | Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity |
Inhalt: |
ix
223 S. |
ISBN-13: | 9789048160235 |
ISBN-10: | 9048160235 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Ausstattung / Beilage: | Paperback |
Einband: | Kartoniert / Broschiert |
Redaktion: | Meheus, Joke |
Herausgeber: | Joke Meheus |
Auflage: | Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 2002 |
Hersteller: |
Springer Netherland
Springer Netherlands Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity |
Verantwortliche Person für die EU: | Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, D-69121 Heidelberg, juergen.hartmann@springer.com |
Maße: | 235 x 155 x 13 mm |
Von/Mit: | Joke Meheus |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 07.12.2010 |
Gewicht: | 0,365 kg |
Zusammenfassung
Includes supplementary material: [...]
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Preface. From Copernicus to Ptolemy: Inconsistency and Method; T. Nickles. Inconsistent Reasoning toward Consistent Theories; A.I. Miller. Inconsistencies in the History of Mathematics; J.P. Van Bendegem. Mathematical Change and Inconsistency; O. Bueno. Approximate Truth; B. Brown. Inconsistency in Science: A Partial Perspective; N. da Costa, S. French. Inconsistency and the Empirical Sciences; G. Priest. In Defence of a Programme for Handling Inconsistencies; D. Batens. How to Reason Sensibly yet Naturally from Inconsistencies; J. Meheus. Why the Logic of Explanation is Inconsistency-adaptive; E. Weber, K. De Clercq. A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory II; J.D. Norton. Inconsistency, Generic Modeling, and Conceptual Change in Science; N.J. Nersessian. Index.
Details
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2010 |
---|---|
Fachbereich: | Allgemeines |
Genre: | Importe, Philosophie |
Jahrhundert: | Antike |
Rubrik: | Geisteswissenschaften |
Thema: | Lexika |
Medium: | Taschenbuch |
Reihe: | Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity |
Inhalt: |
ix
223 S. |
ISBN-13: | 9789048160235 |
ISBN-10: | 9048160235 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Ausstattung / Beilage: | Paperback |
Einband: | Kartoniert / Broschiert |
Redaktion: | Meheus, Joke |
Herausgeber: | Joke Meheus |
Auflage: | Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 2002 |
Hersteller: |
Springer Netherland
Springer Netherlands Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity |
Verantwortliche Person für die EU: | Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, D-69121 Heidelberg, juergen.hartmann@springer.com |
Maße: | 235 x 155 x 13 mm |
Von/Mit: | Joke Meheus |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 07.12.2010 |
Gewicht: | 0,365 kg |
Sicherheitshinweis